Mill vs. Raz Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

donkeywork vs. Raz - canvass ExampleGuided by one very simple principle he outlines an argument for a system, which he believed, provided the trounce possible environment for individual and social progress (Mill, 1991, p.30). Mill advocates for humans shortcoming and their in freeness of knowledge, which means that the rectitude is not always the truth. Based on Mills assertions, any one company who attempts to coerce another group or individual is breaching individual indecorousness, which leads to the stagnation of the intellectual community. The key to progress lies in the condition of seek the best span of human experience and development. The individual in the Millian liberal society is engaged in experiments in living attempts to find new, deeper or merely different sources of happiness in deportment, uncoerced by the state or fellow individuals. (Ryan, 1991, p.166) The most important aspect of welfare is to note that the individual has complete authority in matters re garding themselves, society does not afford the right to restrict the individual, as long as the actions of the individual is not causing harm to themselves or others. Liberty is, therefore, an integral component of well-being liberty provides the best possible conditions to achieve the permanent interests of man as a progressive being. (Mill, 1991, p.31)In Josephs Razs The faith of Freedom, his theory does not rest on a human beings fallacies but instead he argues that the individuals w... Raz creates an image of the individuals well-being results from not just one being but that individuals situation within a culture, history, and society. He makes the simple argument that if a government can make a universal decision to hold open murder, then the state can act in defense of moral reason. Raz states that governments should promote the moral timber of the life of those whose lives and actions they can affect. (1988, p.415) He advocates that the individuals will adapt to societ ys preferences and then will be able to have a good life, striving for well-being. Raz declares that the importance of a liberal society does not rely on the individual choice, as it does for Mill, but instead the individual should be able to choose between respective(a) alternatives that have been determined and supported by the society where the individual resides. A persons well-being should not be dependant on how the individual lives their life and how they determine their actions to be of vale but rather their well-being rests on how living a life is valuable independent of how it helps the individual. As he explains, an autonomous life is valuable only if it is spent in the pursuit of acceptable and valuable projects and relationships. (1988, p.417) To best illustrate Mill and Razs ideals for an individuals well-being take for example an persons addiction to alcohol. Through Mills theory, the demand and priority for an individuals liberty in this self-regarding action and t he belief in human experimentation does not accrue any benefits for the individual. It is highly unlikely that the bulk of individuals will benefit from a life influenced by drugs. Raz on the other hand argues that the life of a drug addict is clearly inferior in terms